The Dangers of Googlethink

Posted by:

As a child of the 80s, the definitive historical event of my young life was the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger.  To this day, I can remember exactly the circumstances when I heard the news:  I was a senior in high school, sitting in Ms. Figley’s anatomy and physiology class, when Mr. Davis–a revered teacher who had been at the school for what seemed like forever–opened the door and told all of us, “The space shuttle just blew up.”  My classmates were stunned.  Nobody knew what to say.  In reality, there really wasn’t anything to say.  As American kids, we had simply taken for granted the amazing technology that lifted human beings into space.  To us, the liftoffs had almost become routine.  Nobody had ever considered the possibility of catastrophic failure–and yet it had happened, and when it did every single one of us was shaken to the core.

Years later, I found out that the Challenger disaster was anything but unpredictable–that NASA managers had, in fact, been  aware of the defects in engineering that caused one of the solid rocket boosters to malfunction.  They also knew the dangers of launching in extremely cold weather, but gave the go-ahead even though temperatures on the pad had dipped below 22 degrees.  So why did seven astronauts have to die?  An investigation into the disaster revealed the answer:  NASA’s management culture had become so insulated, an atmosphere of groupthink had taken hold in the decision-making process.  Because there had never been a major failure before, it was simply assumed there could never be one.  And with all of the checks and backups in place, it was also assumed that that failure of one system would be compensated for by another.  In short, everybody thought that everybody else knew what they were doing–and nobody wanted to be the boat rocker who caused launch delays by raising concerns about how rubber rings got brittle when the weather was really cold.

NASA learned its lesson and changed its practices, but just temporarily.  Seventeen years later, while re-entering Earth’s atmosphere, the space shuttle Columbia was destroyed when hot gases penetrated the silica tiles on the leading edge of the port side wing, causing a massive structural failure that tore the ship apart.  The subsequent investigation determined that the tiles had been damaged during launch, when a chunk of insulating foam broke away from the big external fuel tank and struck the wing at high speed.  Again, the investigation revealed that NASA was fully aware of the dangers of foam strikes, and that flight engineers knew that the wing might have sustained damage grave enough to put the ship in danger–but they chose not to alert the crew, or have them inspect the wing.  Groupthink had taken hold yet again, and seven more lives were lost as a result.

So how does all this relate to Google?  Well, the company is currently dealing with a disaster of its own–one that should have been entirely predictable, and yet took them completely by surprise.  It all started innocuously enough, with a memo posted on an internal message board by James Damore, one of Google’s engineers.  In it, Damore pointed out flaws in the company’s efforts to recruit more women for technical positions, stating that these programs were themselves discriminatory and not very effective.  Damore’s real sin, however, was in pointing out that perhaps  biological differences could account for some of the disparity in the number of women who pursue technical careers.  He also linked to scientific research that supported his point, and said that while he also values diversity, he thought that Google would be more successful in attracting female employees if it took into account some of these innate characteristics.  The company’s leftist culture, however, made it next to impossible to even discuss such matters–a problem that Damore said was holding Google back from achieving its goals.

For that, he was terminated.

Now, Google is weathering a firestorm of criticism for retaliating against an employee for raising concerns in a private forum about the company’s employment practices.  Moreso, the incident has also exposed that–in spite of spending hundreds of millions of dollars on diversity efforts–the company still employs far more men than women.  This, in turn, has led to the possibility that over 60 women will file a class-action lawsuit against Google for sexist hiring practices.  Damore, meanwhile, is contemplating a lawsuit of his own, stating that his rights to voice concerns about workplace conditions under California law have been violated.

Oh, and Damore’s former colleagues at Google?  In a Blind poll, half of them think he shouldn’t have been fired.

What a mess.  One, by the way, entirely of Google’s own making.  It could have been avoided, though, if there was just one person in management who could have looked and Damore’s memo and realized that he was raising valid points–that Google really does have a monolithic culture, and that this attitude could be preventing them from seeing potential solutions to its problems.  Unfortunately, because of self-selection, all the higher-ups at Google think exactly the same way.  Not only that, their groupthink is ruthlessly enforced–so there was nobody around to stop them from making such a foolish, self-destructive move.

There’s a lesson in there for Google, assuming their management is willing to learn it.

This article was originally posted at The Resurgent.

  Related Posts
  • No related posts found.


  1. หนังโป๊ออนไลน์  October 2, 2017

    Ӏ’m not that much of a inteгnet reader to be honeѕt bᥙt your sites really nice, keep it up!
    I’ll go ahead and bookmark your site to come back in the future.
    All the best

  2. redtube  October 2, 2017

    Hi, I ⅾo think this is an excellent blog.
    I stumƅleduрon it 😉 I wіll revisit once again since i have book-marked
    it. Moneʏ and freеdom is the greatest waү to change, may you Ƅe riсh and
    continue to guіde others.

  3. เงี่ยน  October 3, 2017

    I all tһe time emailed thiѕ webpage post page tߋ all my friends, since
    if lіke to read it after tһat mү contacts will too.

  4. ช่วยตัวเอง  October 3, 2017

    Heⅼlo there, Thегe’s no doubt that your site may be having
    internet brоwser compɑtibility issues. When I take a look at your
    site in Safаri, it looks fine however, when opening
    in Internet Exploreг, it has some overlapping issueѕ.
    I merely wanteԀ to provide you with a qᥙick heads
    up! Aside from that, fantastic blog!

  5. xxxx  October 3, 2017

    Very ɡood article. I certainly appreciate this site.
    Stick with іt!

  6. คลิปหลุด  October 3, 2017

    Nice bⅼog here! Alsօ your site l᧐ads up fast! What web һost are you using?

    Can I get your affiliate link to youг host?

    I wisһ my site loaded up as fast аs yours lol

  7. คลิปเกย์  October 3, 2017

    Hі there very cool blog!! Guy .. Beautifuⅼ ..
    Superb .. I’ll bookmark your blog and takе the feeds also?
    I am glad to search out a lot of helpfuⅼ info here within the post, we’d like work out extra strategies on this reɡard, thanks for sharіng.
    . . . . .

  8. หนังav  October 3, 2017

    Hi tһere colleɑɡues, its fantastic ⲣost regarding teachіngand fully defіned, ҝeep it սp all the time.

  9. เย็ด  October 3, 2017

    What’s up, this weekend is pleasant in favor of me, аs this point in time i am reading this wonderful educational pοst here at my

  10. ro89  October 3, 2017

    I want to tߋ thank you for this great read!!
    I certainly enjoyed every bit of it. I have you book-marked to check out new stuff yߋu post…

  11. nuvid  October 3, 2017

    You made some good points tһere. I looked on the internet
    to learn more about tһе issue and found most іndividuals will gⲟ along with your viеws on this site.

  12. ลิลลา  October 12, 2017

    Write more, thats alⅼ I have to say. Literally,
    it seems as thougһ you relied on the video to make yoᥙr point.
    You clearly know what youre talking about, why thr᧐w away your intelligence on just
    posting videoѕ to yoսr site when you could be gіving սs sometһing enlightening
    to read?